emperor: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 01:52pm on 21/09/2010 under ,
There are 28 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com at 12:58pm on 21/09/2010
Socks are hosiery, no?
I think this is similar to the "Are fish seafood" discussion I started on my LJ a few years ago. It's a matter of definition.
Edited Date: 2010-09-21 01:02 pm (UTC)
 
posted by [identity profile] gayalondiel.livejournal.com at 03:22pm on 21/09/2010
Hosiery, like lingerie, is a subcategory of underwear...

;)
 
posted by [identity profile] didiusjulianus.livejournal.com at 09:28pm on 21/09/2010
I beg to differ but not in an arsey way :D
 
posted by [identity profile] gayalondiel.livejournal.com at 09:31pm on 21/09/2010
Differ all you like! I am not sold to the concept, but it just seems logical since my hosiery is frequently attached to my lingerie... but I am giving too much away ;)
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)
posted by [personal profile] rmc28 at 01:16pm on 21/09/2010
They aren't in the sense that I'm much more relaxed about people seeing my socks than I am them seeing my bra or knickers.

They are in the sense that you usually need a fresh set every day (but then I also want a fresh shirt or tshirt most days).

So no, they are not underwear.
 
posted by [identity profile] keirf.livejournal.com at 01:30pm on 21/09/2010
What, you need fresh socks every day? Why did no one tell me this earlier!
hooloovoo_42: (Brad Strips!)
posted by [personal profile] hooloovoo_42 at 01:27pm on 21/09/2010
They aren't worn under other clothes unless you count long trousers. They are outer garments in their own right when worn with short clothes, eg shorts, skirts, kilts.
 
posted by [identity profile] mistdog.livejournal.com at 09:09pm on 21/09/2010
clothes unless you count long trousers

Long trousers are very widely considered clothes!
mair_in_grenderich: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] mair_in_grenderich at 01:59pm on 21/09/2010
possibly they are smalls, though.
fanf: (silly)
posted by [personal profile] fanf at 02:14pm on 21/09/2010
This.
 
posted by [identity profile] yrieithydd.livejournal.com at 02:13pm on 21/09/2010
It's not entirely logical -- though I suppose one wears them 'under' shoes -- but they are underwear as they're in the same category as pants/knickers.
 
posted by [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com at 03:13pm on 21/09/2010
They aren't in the default meaning of "underwear" but are in the implicit penumbra of metaphorical usage around the word "underwear" (along with detachable shirt collars, hosiery, and other similar garments) that may possibly be used more often than the literal usage.

I wish I were a sufficient grammarian to have a name for that concept, it would make online meaning debates much more succinct.
 
posted by (anonymous) at 04:17pm on 21/09/2010
They are underwear because that's where you find them in the shop, and that's the only reason it could possibly matter what you call them.

S.
 
posted by [identity profile] the-alchemist.livejournal.com at 05:39pm on 21/09/2010
Have you been spying on us? The hotel laundry people don't list a charge for socks, so we debated what box to tick for them when we wanted them washed, and settled on 'underwear'.
emperor: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 05:55pm on 21/09/2010
:-)

No, someone else did the "what you wore today, in detail" bit of a 30-day meme, and after commenting that surely no-one needed to know about their underwear in detail, mentioned what socks they were wearing.
 
posted by [identity profile] pigwotflies.livejournal.com at 05:42pm on 21/09/2010
No, on the grounds that underwear is clothing I wouldn't show off to the world, but I don't mind who sees my socks.
 
posted by [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com at 05:52pm on 21/09/2010
Underwear goes on pink bits! Socks don't go on pink bits!
emperor: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 05:55pm on 21/09/2010
Do you never wash your feet or something? Mine are pink... ;-)
 
posted by [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com at 05:56pm on 21/09/2010
I meant that in the euphemistic sense of erotic tissue aka genitals and nipples. I suppose feet are erotic tissue to some people though!
emperor: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 05:58pm on 21/09/2010
Sorry, couldn't resist the "funny" :)
 
posted by [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com at 05:58pm on 21/09/2010
"" indeed ;)
 
posted by [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com at 08:11pm on 21/09/2010
Socks don't go on pink bits

Were it not for the internet, I'd have probably agreed with you about that.

Now I'm better informed (but squicked) ...
 
posted by [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com at 11:34pm on 21/09/2010
I would argue that a male vest is underwear, but male nipples aren't generally considered "pink" in that there is much less taboo about showing them off in public.
 
posted by [identity profile] malva-hawthorn.livejournal.com at 07:11pm on 21/09/2010
Socks are visible, therefore outerware.
 
posted by [identity profile] piqueen.livejournal.com at 07:20pm on 21/09/2010
This is why the word smalls exists.
 
posted by [identity profile] illusive-shelle.livejournal.com at 07:48pm on 21/09/2010
I would say yes, they are generally underwear. If you think about the equivalent items it becomes much clearer - stockings and suspenders are definitely underwear these days and are part of the 'sock' family when it comes to types of clothing. However, there are socks designed to be seen as outerwear.
 
posted by [identity profile] enismirdal.livejournal.com at 08:27pm on 21/09/2010
I keep them in my underwear drawer. Ergo, underwear.
 
posted by [identity profile] isa62v4.livejournal.com at 09:28pm on 25/09/2010
Interesting. Well, tights are underwear. Therefore stockings are underwear. And socks are just short stockings. Unless ankle socks fall into a different category, while their sisters, knee-high and thigh-high socks, are classed as underwear; and that would just be silly.

And although they are sometimes 'on display', as people have pointed out, they do spend most of their time 'under': under shoes, under trousers, under long skirts. If they appear under shorts and with sandals, people joke about them. In fact, the only item of clothing I wear them over is leggings, and then I am generally wearing them under boots.

Yup. Underwear. Goodnight.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25 26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
OSZAR »